Connecting Dots: The Stage Is Set For Unfettered “Freedoms”

What is he truly after?

Americans seem to agree that the orange president’s first month was highly disruptive; forever-MAGAs seem to love it while others are either genuinely fearful or blissfully ignorant. The orange one told NATO and the EU to go screw themselves; told Canada we’re no longer friends, and turned up his nose at Mexico, which for some mysterious reason, he isn’t interested in annexing (brown people who don’t speak English!). The orange president provided a little ROI for his biggest contributor who was allowed to do what he wanted with the inner workings of the US government seemingly without respect or concern for the lives impacted.

Those of us who aren’t supportive of this president seem to have been asking a particular question again and again lately: What is he really doing behind the scenes that he hopes nobody will notice because of all these shenanigans?

He and his techbro seem to like saying everything will be awesome. When asked for details or where the money will come from, they say something like, “Believe me; it’ll be great”, which ends the discussion if the journalist is sympathetic (or loyal). As of March 2025, we now see news outlet(s) removed from the Oval Office via decree and possibly the first immigrant deported without being charged with anything, which would amount to truely unchecked power and Nazi-like behavior if allowed. What in the world are they not telling us? This administration seems to always deliver half-truths if they deliver any truth at all.

The Scoop

Gizmodo may have just revealed part of their master plan: an idea that has already been launched in Central America. It’s a plan to let rich people essentially create their own countries inside of existing countries where they can create the society of their dreams. These enclaves are called “Freedom Cities” by the organization formally encouraging the idea.

Now, do you know anybody who outwardly says, “You know what? America isn’t free enough – Let’s throw it away, and start over!”? Do you know anybody who believes that America’s freedoms are so frustratingly lacking that they’d rather start an entire country in order to bring those freedoms back? How does one start a new country in this geopolitical climate? It’s not a crazy question; it’s been done before. What freedoms are we really talking about? After all, there are lots of things Americans are NOT free to do – like walk down the street naked while enjoying the mind-altering substances of their choice. Do you think that these freedom-enclave-advocates want to make smoking weed great again? Something tells me they aren’t after a little marijuana at the end of a tough day. It’s starting to seem that maybe they want to do stuff that they won’t EVER be allowed to do legally under the current system, and I don’t think the herb has anything to do with it.

Historically Speaking

The concept of expanding freedoms only in very-well defined places is not a new idea in the US. For example, brothels in Nevada provide legalized prostitution, but that doesn’t cause headlines; does it? The government basically said, “OK. You can carry on… BUT only out here in the desert!” There are also quite a few nude beaches in America along with strip clubs in almost every city. Is it a stretch of the imagination to suggest that some of the president’s supporters may want to create a whites-only “resort” in a similarly isolated place using a similar government-approved exemption? And… is it a stretch of the imagination to suggest that maybe some of these enclavers would like to enjoy themselves in other ways that are currently illegal?

Supporters of the president seem to discount these concerns as “woke ideology and rhetoric” – as if the expression means a bad thing in any way. Perhaps, this characterization would make sense if the president didn’t target non-whites via purges, policies, or deportation. Every photograph of the administration suggests that the orange one prefers the company of white people, and is perfectly comfortable with expressions of white superiority from white supremacist orgs on account of the fact that he freed Jan. 6th rioters and seems to do nothing to discourage their rhetoric. By seeking to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion – with code words like “woke” – they are removing clearly qualified POC. It’s been a constant source of harassment; for example, this Air Force general explains in 1975 that even he had to fight off accusations that he didn’t earn his rank.

These are the reasons it seems reasonable IMO to suggest that this president would have no problem with a resurgence of the Klan. “Make America White Again” isn’t a slogan they can sell today, but they have other stuff to sell, and it all smells like the same old s===. It’s so easy to say, “I’m not a racist” in one breath and “I believe people should be free to live, think, and believe whatever they want” in the next, which all stinks like “I sure would like to use the N-word again!”. Sure seems to me someone would like to proudly wear his little white outfit with the pointy hat again.

Cake For Sovereign Citizens To Both Have AND Eat

The concept of the sovereign citizen is nothing new. It’s a phenomenon that appears to exist only in countries that already provide a number of freedoms for its citizens like the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia. Sovereign citizens’ position is that while they may have been born within a country’s borders, they never chose that citizenship, nor did they agree to its terms. Thus, they claim to be free of any obligation to honor any of that country’s rules and law enforcement. It’s like a child claiming there’s no need to respect the rules of a house because s/he never chose his/her parents OR that house. Perhaps, the concept is logically sound; however, sovereign citizens seem to frequently forget the fact that as independent entities beholden to no one, they are bound by their own declaration to defend it. In other words, their claim will continue to be laughed at as long as they fail to force law enforcement to respect them.

Rules For Thee, But Not For Me

The Orange President recently announced that a “path” to American citizenship can be bought for $5M. This and his previous embrace of H1-B visas seems inconsistent with his evident disdain for immigrants. If the Freedom Cities Coalition magically has its plans approved by the orange administration, according to the Gizmodo article:

These zones would allow wealthy investors to write their own laws and set up their own governance structures which would be corporately controlled and wouldn’t involve a traditional bureaucracy.

Would this not amount to the legislation of state-sanctioned sovereign citizenry? In a system of state-sanctioned enclaves, Americans still would not be able to claim sovereignty as independent citizens, BUT they’d get the option of joining an enclave that supports a clearly-defined body of rules that may or may not correspond with his/her true vision – if they can afford it while maintaining their American citizenship. I suspect there would also be “other requirements”. The worst part of this entire plan is that Freedom Cities advocates appear to have their eyes on inhabiting America’s national parks, which the orange one has already targeted for logging and timber money.

Is it inconceivable or conspiratorial thinking to connect-the-dots and hypothesize that the orange one would like to have enclaves for the wealthy where they can live out their fantasies under the guise of providing more freedom than any previous president? It seems this president would like to make the entire world his playground especially after telling the world he basically wants Gaza for himself. At the present, rich people have to travel in order go somewhere where they can party like it’s 1999, which has meant using currently-existing enclaves such as private resorts, islands, etc. Will Americans allow their national parks to be stolen from them in order to allow the rich to create micro fiefdoms where they are legally allowed to act as crazy – or as nazi – as they truly wish?

Which Opens The Door To…

While it doesn’t seem likely that slavery can gain ANY acceptance under the country’s current constitution, it seems disturbingly plausible that such practices may be allowed in an enclave as an expression of its personal, independent, and isolated “freedom”. These people could enslave anyone guilty of trespassing! Furthermore, why would anyone expect those enclaves to remain the same size forever? If a white supremacist enclave with its own border and constitution were created in some corner of Idaho, don’t you think they might want to expand that to the entire state?

I would LOVE for someone to demonstrate that I am just a fearmongering conspiracy theorist; however, just connect the dots! I realize that “connect the dots” is what every conspiracy theorist with a situation room full of linked photographs and newspaper clippings would say. Perhaps, I shall console myself by repeating “It’s just a conspiracy” hundreds of times; however, my advice is to keep your ears open for any news involving the Freedom Cities Coalition especially if smart ones like Rachel Maddow say anything about it. If the orange guy approves any of it, I think we’re in a truly perilous situation. If that happens, maybe you’ll be motivated to connect a few dots as well.

–end–

We hope you enjoyed this free article; if you’d like to see more, please feel free to send money. ST